Violence Against Women Act: Do the rights of men matter?
Having cleared the intellectual nit-pickers out of the picture, it was time to commence the real work of undertaking an extreme make-over of our nation’s domestic violence laws.
Having cleared the intellectual nit-pickers out of the picture, it was time to commence the real work of undertaking an extreme make-over of our nation’s domestic violence laws.
Just know that for the Genders to exist requires collaboration. If you have a crack instead of a penis and are challenged by this statement it’s called fucking and if you can’t afford your own test tube you will have to go the old fashion route.
This is choice nugget is fodder for a dozen articles itself. Stated succinctly, marriage version 2.0 is a construct affording legal and financial advantage to women, and legal and financial liability to men.
Not so long ago I read a post by an MRA who frequents this site and his name is Merlin. The post briefly told of a story about this man’s brother and a hell he’s now in. A hell whipped up by his girlfriend. There was nothing earth shattering about the story, in fact it …
AVFM Radio will be on again On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 8:00 p.m. Central Standard Time, U.S.
It is curious to consider that rape for a woman does not represent a biological contradiction to her utility as it would and does for a male victim of rape. Yet we pay the male victim no fare. This ethical contradiction suggests that female rape may be better represented as a property crime. It may be better simply to issue rape insurance to women as some governments are now offering the payout. Once privatized, behaviors that may contribute to the occurrence can be scrutinized by female executive peers who may be wildly unimpressed with slut-walks and more diligent with their ethics.
Did you write any angry letters to your congressman or to the editor of your local newspaper when Crystal Gayle Mangum got off scot free after being busted lying about being raped – at the expense of three innocent men? How about the same for Danielle Ndonye who lied about being raped by five men at Hofstra University in New York?
Bet you didn’t.
I don’t steer around the word to present a polite face to the public. I do not use an unwieldy alternative to disguise my contempt for men who collaborate in legal marginalization of male identity.
After the gruesome political suicide of Thomas Ball, feminist ideologues openly mocked the decade of pain and abuse which drove him to self immolate. But even this triumphal crowing over a man’s burned corpse lacked the open sadism demonstrated by Abdullah’s recent commentary. And this is where I must admit confusion.
As reported on 30th June, three young British men were tragically killed in a bus crash in Thailand while on gap year from university.
One would think that the feminist sector might remain silent on the issue, since the accidental death of men has no obvious bearing upon issues of women’s rights or sexual equality – which, I am assured, is all feminism is really about. But then, feminists haven’t been particularly good at holding their tongues just lately, have they?