An impartial legal system, which treats human beings as individuals, is a barrier against collective punishment. To do away with it altogether would allow for the punishment of many more men, on the basis that they are men, which is why feminists have fought so relentlessly to overturn impartiality
When women talk about shoes, I don’t suppose a lot of them have these images in mind. While they are buying a pair of the latest fashionable boots from the hottest ‘designer of the moment’, many families are affected and grieving for the men who have donned, and lost life and limb, in his particular footwear.
In Marcotte’s article, she indulges the liberal/feminist fallacy that the enthusiasm for sculpting the kind of muscular, traditionally masculine physiques you see on Men’s Health covers is symptomatic of some kind of homoerotic attraction/repulsion complex. Her inability to cope with difference blinds her to the obvious; men’s bodies react differently to exercise from women’s.
Modern feminism, in keeping with modern feminist tradition, has expanded modern feminist sexual harassment law to include just about anything that a modern feminist doesn’t like, or that she claims years later not to have liked, and left out entirely what any man out there may not like. In short, with sexual harassment law, it is men who are screwed, not women.
Her name is Christine Armstrong. She lives and works in Robertsdale, Alabama. She’s employed by The Lighthouse, a domestic abuse services program running on, among other things, your tax dollars.
Christine’s work number is listed as 251-947-6197, and she can be emailed at bcfvdcd@gulftel.com.
And oh yes, here is her picture.
I’ll state clearly what we all know, but that nobody seems willing to admit. Slut walk is possible only because these privileged trotters are the most pampered, protected, consequence-immune demographic who have ever taken up public space in human history.
Paul Elam has asked me to take a managerial role on this site, and I have accepted. That does not mean I will be proofing articles for spelling and grammar, as I know myself to be unqualified for that task. I will be developing and coordinating projects, some of which will reach outside the limits of this site. Paul and I agree that continued success of this movement will be driven by participation from MRA’s with the courage and intelligence to act.
Has anybody ever seen a feminist pushing for equal numbers of male and female coal miners? It might happen, when coal mining becomes a job done from the safety of an air conditioned suite, without the multiple hazards male coal miners presently endure.
Ah, but we really can’t. Not with any real concern for women who actually are victims of rape. Personally, considering men are the more frequent but utterly ignored victims of rape, and with the epidemic of false rape accusations and corrupt prosecutions becoming just as pervasive, my interest in women who get raped any more is somewhere near as intense as my interest in cake decorating and midget wrestling.
So if you come here to voice your objections to these articles, but insist on relying on the false premise that we are advocating rape tolerance, or absolving the rapist of responsibility for his or her crime, then you will be summarily removed and banned.
