It certainly becomes a challenge to draw the fine line between what is attacking the chivalrous norm and what is attacking women. The two are so interwoven and enmeshed that a cut to one will make the other bleed. Walking on eggshells, given that reality, won’t help.
[As written for thegoodmenproject.com, prior to the heavy handed editing of it’s management – PE] It’s hard to decide, when approaching a subject such as this, exactly the best approach to take. Explaining the Mens Movement, in however cursory a manner, involves exploding so many of the cultural myths we live with day to day …
And despite their meager incomes, the state is collecting their tax dollars and spending part of it to keep convincing them their poverty and discontent is a function of patriarchal sexism.
This video was produced in one of the Indian dialects, and though it is several minutes long the story is so familiar that no translations will be required. Of the many encouraging things about the video are the great, well told story and high production values. This kind or work filtering out into the MSM …
“The Office of the Senior Advisor to the Secretary of State for Women’s Empowerment.” No, that’s not the clandestine front group from a Tom Clancy spy novel, nor is it a libertarian’s bad dream. Rather, it’s is a real-life program underwritten by the U.S. taxpayer. A brainchild of Hillary Clinton, the unit’s declared mission is …
The only women who are going to be invited to the peace negotiating tables are women who can be just as ruthless, uncaring, spiteful, greedy, and violent as the men who are sitting there. In short, the really nasty sort of feminists. To be more specific, not the sort of women who are truly anti-war.
Lecture No. 1 “I love an opposition that has convictions” – Frederick the Great The Battle of the Sexes has degenerated into a Dirty War, and we are, each of us, being drafted into it by forces who care not a whit for equality or fairness. Propaganda, as a tool of control, is effective only …
“Whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object, intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen by such woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, shall be punished with imprisonment …
As to contempt for traditional masculinity, I have none. I don’t even know that anyone can tell me what it means (though many try). I’ll save my contempt for stupidity and chosen blindness. Let the “patriarch’s” of the word have their folly. It matters not to me. I will be busy surviving as they march themselves and their unfortunate progeny into the grinding halls of family justice. We’ll call it intellectual culling, and the world will be better for it.
It is clear, beyond any conceivable notion of error, that this incident is a result of a culture of government sanctioned, no, promoted, violence against men in India. I will summarily dismiss, in advance, any notion that this was just an isolated incident and not sparked by the pervasive mentality of government authorities that men are legitimate targets for unjustified abuse on the supposed behalf of women.
