So if you come here to voice your objections to these articles, but insist on relying on the false premise that we are advocating rape tolerance, or absolving the rapist of responsibility for his or her crime, then you will be summarily removed and banned.
(Sung to the tune of “Walk Like an Egyptian“) Don your tube top, paint that face like you’re charging fifty cents Bend over slow – oh hey ho – and spread ‘em for the men Now take a shot, show your slot, you know it’s just pretend Now drink some more – oh hey ho …
In truth, the practice of women dressing in “sluttish” attire outside the context of parades through Toronto’s downtown, is purposeful. A woman dressing in a deliberately sexually provocative style is flaunting her sexual power over men. She is saying, in a language older than any spoken or written:
“I am an object of sexual desire, and I am a person of protected status”
The continually escalating narrative of “protecting” women by affording them ever greater protection and privilege above and beyond the legal rights of “bad” men is designed to produce a society in which nobody has legal rights except for the members of a few banking families. Not even women will have human rights in that world, because the men who would have protected them will be, and are being reduced to the legal status of furniture and appliances.
And that is precisely what you get when you start making lists of “women” inventors, instead of just listing inventors. When you do that, you set things up as a competition. And when you push women to compete with men, they are always going to get completely waxed, and I don’t mean at the spa.
Women, for too long, have been the ones regulating sex education classes and they’ve been about empowerment and safe sex.
When a child is involved and child support is on the table, there is no such thing as safe sex.
This war is a CRUDE business.
The young men we have sacrificed and the families we have ripped apart, are just the fodder offered up for a corporatocracy that knows no limit to avarice and indecency.
For at least half a century, the overwhelming evidence that intelligence is determined very significantly by genes has been hidden from the public – by the usual culprits. The politically-correct view was that the environment was the most significant factor in the development of intelligence and that genes were almost irrelevant.
The aim of the kafkatrap is to produce a kind of free-floating guilt in the subject, a conviction of sinfulness that can be manipulated by the operator to make the subject say and do things that are convenient to the operator’s personal, political, or religious goals. Ideally, the subject will then internalize these demands, and then become complicit in the kafkatrapping of others.
[box type=”alert” size=”large” style=”rounded” icon=”none”] With regrets, there will be no AVfM Radio Program tonight. Manuel Dexter and I have been immersed in a project of considerable size for the past several days, and it simply did not allow sufficient time for show prep. My apologies to all listeners for the late notice. I was …
