The Independent recently ran a story claiming that deep inequalities continue to face women in the UK labour market. Mike Buchanan pours a bucket of cold water their pity-party by dubunking the claims with fact and a little common sense.
What happens when men come to the conclusion that women have little to offer them but sorrow grief and punishment? Where will the future take us as more and more men come to this conclusion? Clint Carpentier has some thoughts.
There was a time when women were responsible for a significant amount of domestic labor. Thanks to technology ‘housewives’ today have very little work to do in the home save one or two hours of relaxed housework which they can weave among their leisure activities. However, the leisure class would like to forego those remaining few chores and are increasingly asking full-time working husbands to take the weight off their petite shoulders. Clint Carpentier provides an overview of the conundrum.
All men are potential rapists says feminism, so all women should go out and buy “Anti-Rape Wear,” a recent reinvention of the chastity belt designed to deter men’s rapey penises. Attila L. Vinczer gives an assessment of “AR Wear” and the hysteria that birthed it.
Ah, the weather is warming up, the coats and sweaters are coming off, outdoor events are being scheduled as people are shaking off the last of the winter cold. Summer is in the air, and it is time for a Slutwalk. That is fine with Dan Perrins, who has plans to attend, and some questions to ask.
If you ask Gordon Wadsworth, feminism isn’t and perhaps never was a socially progressive movement. Tied to and subservient to archaic sex roles, feminism is just another expression of old school humanity, and as such it serves as an impediment to self-actualization for both men and women.
Feminists that don’t need men will need the state, which is run by the worst sorts of men and women imaginable. Now the state is our father, and what a rotten dad he is.
I feel it is important to start sharing my story in order to shed light on the women who are not held accountable for the mental and/or physical destruction they inflict upon their children. My mother’s anti-male brainwashing, albeit uncontrived in the sense that she wasn’t smart enough to be intentionally devious, was unprecedented. And for what? To have a lifetime of emotional control over her sons?
We are the ones putting an end to oppressive gender roles. So I suggest that is what we let them know, and that we point out to them exactly why they are nothing more than a continuation of the old paradigm, enforced with shame and bullets.
They still find that the taxes they have to pay still go towards ever more programs for women. Scratch that…I meant ‘young families’ (read: single mothers). It’s like the Government doesn’t know about all the struggling men. Of course, we know different, but when you view men as non-human cannon fodder, the Darwinian way government treats disadvantaged men becomes much more understandable.
