Mason Oltman, MD of Tacoma, WA “Known Genital Mutilator”
The doctor should really ask himself if the patient whom he just circumcised actually wanted this mutilation and if the boy is glad you took that choice away from him.
The doctor should really ask himself if the patient whom he just circumcised actually wanted this mutilation and if the boy is glad you took that choice away from him.
At long last a feminist takes a look at feminism and how it treats their “male allies”. August Løvenskiolds reviews her findings.
At times it’s difficult to not sink into despair over the callous antipathy society shows toward men Mark Dent relays his recent experience.
Sooner or later, every man will have to debitch his life. Paul offers some tips for when the time comes.
Sometimes a review of the basics is in order. This is especially true about women, where men forget the basics all the time.
Kay unknowingly reveals that circumcision was done to minimize pleasure for men and boys when she shames intactivists in their quest for “erotic freedom,” believing male sexual pleasure would discourage “ethical mating”. I think that’s what feminism and the family courts are doing, not the foreskin.
MRAs get accused all the time of “just being angry.” Paul’s response? So what?
So, they make sure that no stranger is able to kidnap and possibly injure the infant and interrupt the scheduled mutilation of the males by a different stranger. One who gets paid.
Imagine living in a world with no men. Deidre provides a look into the movie ‘’No Men Beyond This Point’’ which explores that possibility.
The story of Theodore Prodromos provides an example of why men are reluctant to speak up about abuse.