Dan Perrins went to the University of Toronto to cover a lecture on the effects of feminism on men. It was a lecture that many people did not want men to hear. In Dan’s research for the assignment, he also did a great job drawing out the reasons that they don’t want the truth to see the light of day.
Mike Buchanan of the political party Justice for Men and Boys (and the women who love them) has started an investigation into the political activities of a government supported charity, which is just a wee bit illegal in Great Britain. The Fawcett Society may have a little bit of explaining to do. Or a whole lot.
A plan is about to be pushed for ratification by the European Union. One of the objectives is to ban adult oriented material from the internet, but as you sift through the collectivist rhetoric of the proposal, you see the plan is to eliminate much more than just porn.
In the spirit of things lately, it seems that university groups dedicated to actually helping men are starting to pop up in the most unexpected places: Universities. And the action appears to be getting more intense. From NCFM.
The post here by Kelly Jones raised quite a bit of discussion, both in support of and dissent from her opinions. August Lovenskiolds has some more refection on the matter, proffering that Ms. Jones may have confused practicality for laziness.
Suz is of a mind to kick some ass and take some names, and she needs your help. She’s compiling a list of volunteers for targeted email campaigns. She thinks everyone, from senators to janitors, should know what their own courts are up to.
We became men by fighting and overcoming our own challenges. Challenge makes men stronger – do we disrespect women so much that we cannot grant them the same opportunity to advance through their own success in overcoming challenge without our interference?
Bob Beckel may just have destroyed his career as a highly paid political puppet that helps spread propaganda on Fox New. Paul Elam feels sorry for him and wants to come to his defense. Well, not so much, but he really wanted to.
Recently the work of Kelly Jones was presented on this site. It contained a lot of cogent and salient observations about the nature of men and women. But not so fast, says Paul Elam. There is one glaring problem in the middle of all this wisdom.
How to win an argument every time? Simple. Establish a questionable premise, or multiple questionable premises at once, then paint everyone who questions the premise as being hateful and evil and “part of the problem.” Kristina Hansen gives an example.
