You say there’s a marriage strike?
So you say there’s a marriage strike? Men in increasing numbers are refusing to be good little appliances and are not settling for their traditional roles of protector and provider.
So you say there’s a marriage strike? Men in increasing numbers are refusing to be good little appliances and are not settling for their traditional roles of protector and provider.
Gonzo Historian, Robert St. Estephe, offers us another fascinating look into the past with a historic marriage strike that was, literally, a strike. It happened in Tibet.
Gonzo Historian, Robert St. Estephe, returns with yet another lesson in the Unknown History of Misandry. This is the history they don’t teach in schools or gender studies classes, folks. It’s the stuff that’s been expelled from the official record and it’s here for your edification. Today’s piece is on the Advice columnist Dorothy Dix and her advice to women that they are “killing the goose that laid the golden egg.”
Why do we fall in love? Our analysis of the issues surrounding Men Going Their Own Way continues with Peter Wright’s overview into the nature of attachment and why humans are so fond of each other. The science about attachment that he reveals may surprise you and this historical context of just why we believe what we believe about men’s sexuality will definitely enlighten.
“Going Your Own Way” has for years been a slogan in the men’s movement for men who refuse to be defined by social convention or be told what to do. For some, it seems instead to have turned into a determinist fatalism. Jason Gregory analyzes fatalism and deliberation to determine if Going Your Own Way is even compatible with a fatalistic world view. [Illustration by Europa Phoenix.]
A Man Going His Own Way, Peter Wright has been in the men’s movement for over 20 years. More than just a political movement, the men’s movent is about men discovering the value of self-determination and individualism: celebrating it and encouraging it to change the cultural zeitgeist. And Peter’s got a bone to pick with certain attitudes that have emerged within the movement.
Scholar and Man Going His Own Way Peter Wright has a look at people’s ideas about love and marriage throughout history, and concludes that much of what we today call “romance” is a historical aberration starting in the middle ages with the concept of courtly love and the image of white knights on bended knee, begging for a token from their Lady.
August Løvenskiolds throws a question into the MGTOW ring. If a savvy, monied man can’t chose the right woman, what chance does the average man have? And why make it worse by shaming Mr. Average for throwing in the towel when Mr. Ultra Successful gets KO’d in the first round at Divorce Court?
Covert attempts at Communist-Libertarian subversion of the men’s movement have been uncovered, and forced our hand. The long-awaited confrontation between MHRAs and MGTOWs has begun! Who will win, Evil AVfM or Mighty Barbarossaa?
This is a feminist society which treats men as walking cash and sperm dispensers, and whether most men characterize the situation in the stark terms I’ve used, they increasingly understand it.