Women were not oppressed by not having the vote
Fidelbogen lays out the case, simply and to the point. The lack of voting rights for women and oppression are two entirely different things, and both have been blown out of proportion.
Fidelbogen lays out the case, simply and to the point. The lack of voting rights for women and oppression are two entirely different things, and both have been blown out of proportion.
In a continuation of the reactions to recent vicious and dishonest portrayal of the MRM on feminist blogs, John the Other offers thanks to OCWeekly’s Matt Coker and Jezebel.com writer Anna North.
In another stab at staying relevant, fembots and sycophants try to paint the MRM as pro-murder. It came off as stupid as it sounds. Paul Elam offers some advice, and a fuck you to the culprits.
John the Other issues some questions to the moderators of Wikipedia. We assume, of course, that these questions will go unanswered, as appears to be the default reaction of Wikipedia to any uncomfortable inquiries.
In a sudden and sweeping change of the Wikipedia page on Men’s Rights, references to the myriad of issues and efforts highlighted over the past forty years of pro-male activism have been replaced with the standard litany of feminist dogma.
Ignoring the male victim demographic is a strategy designed to fail and to escalate violence within society. The grievance industry pursues this plan-for-failure with the intent of producing more female casualties, because it pays.
The existence of individuals who suffer from sexual dislocation – sometimes labeled transexuals – is a vexation to gender feminists. By existing, they disprove the hypothesis of sex’s social construction.
The crosshairs fallacy springs from a childish belief that the vital force of the non-feminist revolution concentrates in a point source — for example, a certain community of websites
AVfM Radio will be doing a very special show, including an exploration of “What Women Want,” and in interview with Tom Martin, who is suing the London School of Economics for gender discrimination against men.
The attempt to control the definition of a “real man” is considerably more pervasive than the long reach and direct address of the topic in the mainstream media, and it is increasingly more shrill.