The current FBI definition of rape refers to the penetration of the vagina or anus without the consent of the victim. Clearly this erases all victims of rape who are forced to penetrate, generally men or boys forced to have sex with women. To help correct this definition we urge you to join us in writing to key organisations, starting with RAINN on March 15.
THE TRAVESTY of justice that is the gynocentric Canadian legal system continues unabated with the news that Meredith Borowiec is to receive a paltry 18 month sentence for two counts of infanticide, with a suspended sentence on the charge of aggravated assault. Borowiec killed her newborn babies in 2008, 2009, and attempted to kill another …
Victor Zen manages to utterly destroy everything Laci Green stands for with five minutes of raw ginger rage.
First wave feminism helped bring women the vote, at least in some places. Among other things, second wave feminism helped open a world of choices to women they previously did not have. And what is the third wave’s defining accomplishment? Creating a culture of victimhood where women can manufacture outrage, and ride it straight to the bank.
Diana Davison notices that women’s lived experiences trump all other perspectives, except when those women’s lived experiences do not match the ideological requirements of other women. And it’s all ultimately men’s fault, apparently, although how that’s so ain’t exactly clear.
The results are in, people prefer male over female bosses because they are easier to work for. Mike Buchanan tells us at least 10 good reasons for why this is so.
In a hilarious takedown of everyday pseudo-logic, B.R. Merrick says it takes an education in idiocy to believe men ever oppressed women and that, as a result, feminism has accomplished great things for women or men. We think he has a point.
AVfM Director of Collegiate Activism, Sage Gerard, was recently able to attend and record a presentation by two of the world’s most influential feminists–and has a report.
Much is being made of the End of Men. But is it really so? And really, if you start taking a look at all the facts, for which can you make a stronger case? The end of men? Or the end of women?
Someone showed up in the comments, and in familiarly smug fashion posed a good many questions to Paul Elam about his ideas on men in society, and on feminism. He decided they were best answered in an article. It is not exactly a debate, but it may be as close as we get.
