The inflated definition of misogyny
It’s easy, and pretty common, to charge MRA’s with being conspiracy nuts. But that is in a topsy-turvey world where feminists see patriarchal machinations and oppression around every corner.
It’s easy, and pretty common, to charge MRA’s with being conspiracy nuts. But that is in a topsy-turvey world where feminists see patriarchal machinations and oppression around every corner.
It’s easy, and pretty common, to charge MRA’s with being conspiracy nuts. But that is in a topsy-turvey world where feminists see patriarchal machinations and oppression around every corner.
Imagine that for a day that all aspects of sexual roles in this world were reversed; that men experienced the lives of women and that women actually experienced the lives with which most men actually contend. Just imagine.
A new look at ad-hominem arguments, ineffective in silencing, unable to induce shame, and spotted easily by any moderately expererienced MRA, why keep using them?
Have you ever thought that feminists pick and choose when they want to claim something is discrimination, and, consequently, privilege? If so, you are not alone. Zerbu is with you.
Sometimes we tend to think that feminists pull their ideas, and statistics, out of thin air; that they come to their ideas willy nilly. But Zerbu has stumbled on to a clear formula.
It’s easy, and pretty common, to charge MRA’s with being conspiracy nuts. But that is in a topsy-turvey world where feminists see patriarchal machinations and oppression around every corner.
Feminists, who continually assert that there are no real differences between men and women except those that are socialized, suddenly become born again evo-psych believers when violence is against women is discussed.