Georgetown University, located near the epicenter of American politics, has a scandal of huge proportions threatening its reputation and its coffers. An employee of the school has been caught trashing applications from students who are male, and who are white.
Recently Paul Elam wrote an article about Zach Rosenberg, who called his four year old son a rapist for trying to kiss a girl. Zach wrote to express his concerns about the article, or rather about his public image, but he was not concerned enough to correct his mistakes.
Judith Grossman is a card carrying, parade marching, door knocking, progressive supporting feminist. Or at least she was until the politics she helped foster in our culture nearly wiped her own son’s future off the map. Now she is angry. At least for the time being.
And now comes from the mainstream media their coverage on the University of Toronto. They did not get everything right, by any means, but they did do what so far has not been happening. They acknowledge that our issues deserve a platform.
Zach Rosenberg’s four year old son tried to kiss a girl. He trustingly told his father all about it. Big mistake, son. Your father is a sick asshole who just stabbed you in the back so he could be popular with readers at the Good Men Project.
2013 will go down as the year of the Men’s Human Rights Movement. There is a rising tide of interest on college campuses about the affairs of men, not in keeping with the canard of patriarchy theory. It will be an uphill battle, but the end is not in question. The Men’s Human Rights Movement will prevail.
In the continuing efforts to address the problem of the corrupt use of restraining orders in family courts, AVFM is joining forces with other human rights advocacy groups to bring pressure to bear on courts that have lost touch with the intent and spirit of the law, even as they blindly follow its letter.
During the recent protest at the University of Toronto against the lecture by Dr. Katherine Young and Dr. Paul Nathanson, Dan Perrins and John the Other were interviewed by news reporter Avery Haines. Some interesting questions came up, which we had clarified by Iain Dwyer of CAFE.
In a not very surprising turn of events, the editors of the Good Men Project have announced that Tom Matlack is no longer with the publication. Paul Elam opines that it was fully to be expected. No one interested in the well being of men was ever going to make it in a place that cares about anything but.
The mainstream media has come a knock, knock knocking again on Paul Elam’s door, asking questions. This time, they want to know his take on the advancement of women in bidness. As usual, Paul brings his answers to you, in their entirety, just to make sure you see them before the cuts.
