Two Feminist Fallacies
The crosshairs fallacy springs from a childish belief that the vital force of the non-feminist revolution concentrates in a point source — for example, a certain community of websites
The crosshairs fallacy springs from a childish belief that the vital force of the non-feminist revolution concentrates in a point source — for example, a certain community of websites
… but are they? Lucian Vâlsan argues that that’s hardly the case and the evidence is nowhere near as convincing as the press would make it. And no, the fact that it comes from a “Harvard researcher” isn’t particularly impressive in and of itself at all. A thorough rebuttal of the latest Harvard “study” on …
The feminist war on human nature itself is real and waged in the Academe and the culture and largely funded by your tax dollars.
The crosshairs fallacy springs from a childish belief that the vital force of the non-feminist revolution concentrates in a point source — for example, a certain community of websites
The dictionary definition of feminism falls apart when you start examining feminism in the real world. Della Burton uncovers the seething roil of insects under their log.
Feminists deploy two main strategies to deny they hate men. Neither holds up under scrutiny.
AVfM welcomes 17 year old Josh O’Brien, who has already figured out that the “Patriarchy” myth of privileging men over women is, well, a myth. When youngsters are already figuring it out for themselves, we have hope that this hateful notion will die within our lifetimes.
On publication of his paper Sokal exposed his hoax in the journal Lingua Franca. The editors of Social Text immediately cried foul and added a misplaced criticism of Sokal’s writing style. They missed the point, entirely. Sokal’s intent was to write badly (and think badly) yet have his poor scholarship overlooked due to its superficial accordance with leftist ideology.