“Civility is particularly due to all women; and, remember, that no provocation whatsoever can justify any man in not being civil to every woman; and the greatest man would justly be reckoned a brute if he were not civil to the meanest woman. It is due to their sex..” Written a century and a half ago, is this reasoning much different today?
John Stuart Mill published his Subjection of Women in 1869, writing that the State should take over the role of male chivalry. It appears his gynocentric vision has come true.
Modern media presents acid-attack perpetrators as almost exclusively men. History tells a different story.
By coining the term ‘chivalry feminism,’ Ernest B. Bax highlighted feminism’s root power and the reason for its longevity.
Women were instrumental in inspiring and regulating manners at the first sporting tournaments. Has anything changed?
Men are human doings, not human beings – or so we are led to believe by the gynocentric culture that thrives off men’s labor.
Perhaps it is that each age of man must discover the truths about women and love for itself. Over 800 years ago, the spread of courtly love and proto-feminism caused a writer to warn his fellows.
We hear an awful lot about the evils of the male gaze, but rarely do we hear about efforts to harvest that gaze.
Acting much like a feminist, and not unlike a typical personality disordered woman, the Greek Goddess Hera makes for an interesting study
Written 43 years after Mary Wollstonecraft wrote ‘Vindication of the Rights of Woman,’ and a decade before the Seneca Falls Convention, this essay provides a very different perspective on the power, and status of women of the time.
