The Non-Feminist Coalition Rejects Violence
Fidelbogen contemplates the likely outcome of an increasingly tilted social, legal and economic playing field, and suggests avoidance of that result
Accelerating the death of bad ideas
From the keyboard of Fidelbogen, observations of accelerating decline of feminism’s former gloss, conscientious liberation of minds from ideological poison, and establishment of positive public ethos
Exposing feminism’s rotten core
The story AVfM broke about the Radfem Hub is the most read material on this site. And now the story returns, with Fidelbogen at the helm in concert with the illustrious Agent Orange. Luuuucy! You got some more ‘splainin to do!
The battle for feminism’s soul
Much of social discourse hinges on the battle to claim ownership of terms. “Feminist” is a great example. Fidelbogen tells us who has the right to define it.
The ontology of female supremacism
We are all familiar with the “man wrong – woman right” paradigm. Fidelbogen gives us the breakdown on the ideology that puts us in the middle of it.
To my fellow workers in the vineyard
Fidelbogen, recently appointed to the editorial staff at A Voice for Men, offers a few words of introduction, to new readers and old friends alike. We’re all smiles around here.
Women were not oppressed by not having the vote
Fidelbogen lays out the case, simply and to the point. The lack of voting rights for women and oppression are two entirely different things, and both have been blown out of proportion.
All right, so men can stop rape. Your point please?
Effectively, one would need to create an anti-rape police state. I am sure that most feminists, male and female alike, would find nothing to not like about such a scenario.
Two Feminist Fallacies
The crosshairs fallacy springs from a childish belief that the vital force of the non-feminist revolution concentrates in a point source — for example, a certain community of websites
The practice of rhetorical discipline
The opponents of feminism are famous for speaking their minds “not wisely but too well.” In this way they offer grappling points to their enemy and make their own work needlessly difficult.
