Birth control, reproductive rights, abortion, sexual liberation. All key factors by which the ideology of feminism appears to measure itself. But do they ever measure the cost? Codebuster offers some insights.
As is the unfortunately reality every four years in America, we have an election approaching. Though its outcome may have little bearing on our destiny, we are obliged to consider difference there may be in the candidates as it pertains to men’s issues.
One has to wonder how many words, how much energy of thought and passion have been expended on the question of what it means to be a man. Codebuster takes another step toward the goal, although feminists won’t approve.
In discussions of human sociobiology we put a lot of emphasis on genetics. It makes sense. Or does it? Codebuster brings us some “outside the box” perspective on this touchy subject.
In explaining the behaviour of any organism, all that genocentrism provides is a black box and an accompanying assertion that “it’s all in the genes, you dummy”. Not unlike the Creationists’ God and their accompanying assertion that “it’s all in the bible, you heathen”.
We need to get some facts straight regarding the way that women make choices, and that’s what this article is about. Let’s begin with Assanova’s reference to Evolutionary Psychology: Women are attracted to dominant men because their instincts tell them to be. Instincts don’t care whether the guy is abusive of not. Instincts only care what …
