If all females disappeared from the planet tomorrow, life would go on — for a while. The youngest boys would grow up, live their lives, and eventually die of old age. After that, civilization would end — not because it couldn’t function, but because it couldn’t reproduce. But if all males disappeared, society would collapse in a week. And that week would be a hellscape.
Why? Because the systems that keep the modern world running are still overwhelmingly built and maintained by men. Women as a group haven’t developed the institutional knowledge or experience to step in and run it entirely on their own. They didn’t build this world. They inherited it.
Civilized society must be a man’s world, because the women’s world is a slum… a ghetto.
— Dr. Daniel Amneus, Garbage Generation
Amneus warned that a matriarchal society — one where women dominate — would lead to decline. Not because women are inferior, but because they haven’t carried the responsibility of maintaining civilization the way men have for thousands of years. But here’s what makes today’s reality even darker: we don’t need men to vanish to see this collapse. It’s already happening — slowly, quietly.
Men are still around, but increasingly, we’re just here to provide service, pay bills, maintain systems, and fund children that often aren’t even ours — through child support and welfare programs. We keep things running without appreciation, recognition, and without even being desired. With AI advancing fast, even that usefulness might soon disappear.
So yes, they still need us — for now. But let’s not pretend there isn’t a growing fantasy of a world without men. The real question is: what happens when that becomes technically possible?
If women truly want a future that is female, as they love to tell us, there are two ways in which they can achieve this. The first would be to figure out how to create artificial semen and acquire the knowledge to sustain civilization — neither of which is anywhere close. The second would be to enslave 95% of the male population for labor and keep a select few for reproduction (much more likely). Either way, we’re just tools. The improvement gurus and the traditional conservatives keep telling us to try harder and “man up,” leading a march of men to compete for that top percentile. For the rest of us, it’s a march toward slavery and self-deletion.
Women keep telling us they want to be worshipped like goddesses — but the role they actually want is more demonic than divine — like sadistic death-cult maniacs: oppressive and relentless.
Is that the future we want? Take a moment to tap into your humanity and ask yourself, how does this feels?
Now flip the scenario. If men wanted to go on without women, all we’d need is a functioning artificial womb. And if you’ve been paying attention, you already know which of these two outcomes is more likely to happen sooner.
To be clear, this isn’t a call for one sex to dominate or eliminate the other. The urgency in my tone comes from wanting balance — where both sexes carry real responsibility and are held to the same standards of accountability. That doesn’t erase femininity or masculinity; it reinforces them through mutual contribution. It’s basic logic.
The hostility toward men won’t stop until women carry the same burdens men always have. Only then will the champions of matriarchy grasp the pressure and sacrifice they’ve been shielded from — and maybe begin to empathize with the very men they’ve spent decades trying to displace. A human-centric future is possible, but only if we abandon double standards and stop treating responsibility as a male-only burden.
Until then, men cannot keep pretending these patterns are harmless or inevitable. We shouldn’t sit back and watch the matriarchal scenario unfold unchecked — but neither should we romanticize the past and try to shove women back into cages labeled ‘tradition.’
Need I remind you: they’re God’s children too — human.
A future built on the principles of reciprocity, merit, and respect beats one built on delusion and dependence. Every time.
