Brown University declares due process dead
For a man at Brown University, there will be no due process if you are accused of rape. The woman’s version will always be accepted over the man’s.
For a man at Brown University, there will be no due process if you are accused of rape. The woman’s version will always be accepted over the man’s.
Tom Martin reveals that a culture of blatant sexism is being fostered in the prestigious London School of Economics Gender Studies curriculum.
Somehow, some way, B.R. Merrick has taken an issue we have recently beaten into the ground and breathed into it, new life, and we think, new meaning.
This article, which originally ran on TDOM’s blog, has been waiting in the wings during the debate. Readers can’t be denied any longer. TDOM drive it home, as always.
In the last installment of the Elam vs Frost debate, Frost makes the argument for Game/PUA as a viable weapon in the war on feminist ideology and female hegemony.
In part 5 of Elam vs Frost, Paul Elam responds to the allegation that he is promoting celibacy and asserts that the problem of Game and PUA is one of values. Last turn for Elam in the debate.
Frost responds in round two of the six part debate on Game and PUA vs zeta masculinity and the MRM. Frost lays out his definitions and offers some PUAspective.
Whoa! Mr. Telephone! There has been a lot of heat around the issue of Game and the men’s movement in the past few days. Imagine, just in time for the cold weather.
The debate over Game and PUA regularly comes up in the MRM. Love it or hate it, almost everyone has an opinion on it. Paul has one, too. Though it seems more like tossing an egg than a neg. This one could get a little on the hot side.
If it is funny and “delightful” when a woman commits an act of violence against a man, why isn’t it just as funny and “delightful” when a man commits violence against a woman?