Why circumcision is the same as FGM
“Stand by Your Manhood” author Peter Lloyd starts a new YouTube channel with a video on male genital mutilation.
“Stand by Your Manhood” author Peter Lloyd starts a new YouTube channel with a video on male genital mutilation.
Dr. Harris lists what he thinks were historic opponents of circumcision – Greece, Rome, Soviets, Nazis – I guess implying that current intactivists are like Nazis.
Male Genital Mutilation went wrong
Circumcision is a genital mutilation, and people that do it are genital mutilators – and practitioners of this on infants are the worst kind.
If Hillary Clinton gets into office men have every reason to feel castration anxiety.
Complications are not rare, and actually 100% of these babies will have deformed and scarred penises and some level of trauma and nervous system damage.
As society slowly evolves toward sanity, Rabbi Cohn and people like him are increasingly facing opposition. He’s in the news for defending the sometimes deadly practice of sucking the blood from the infant’s mutilated penis.
“Fortunately, as someone with 30 years experience of having a penis, I’m more than qualified to explain why it’s not OK to modify a person’s body without consent.” (NSFW)
“C.R.N.H. was born on October 31, 2010 and is now approximately 4 ½ years old.
C.R.N.H. expressed that he does not want circumcision.
C.R.N.H. expressed that he is afraid of circumcision.”
After all this concern for the baby’s physical and emotional well-being, it seems ridiculous that we would then take only male infants and traumatically sever part of his penis for no reason and without his consent – like an animal being ‘fixed.’