World Socialist Web Site - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 22:36, 2 March 2025

2025-03-02T22:36:01Z

Robert Brockway: Partial import from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Socialist_Web_Site&oldid=1264256135

2025-03-02T22:34:06Z

Partial import from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Socialist_Web_Site&oldid=1264256135

Robert Brockway at 22:30, 2 March 2025

2025-03-02T22:30:36Z

Robert Brockway at 04:51, 20 January 2025

2025-01-20T04:51:14Z

Robert Brockway: /* Quiotes */

2025-01-20T04:50:45Z

Quiotes

Robert Brockway at 04:50, 20 January 2025

2025-01-20T04:50:33Z

Robert Brockway at 04:50, 20 January 2025

2025-01-20T04:50:10Z

Robert Brockway at 23:38, 5 January 2025

2025-01-05T23:38:58Z

Robert Brockway at 23:38, 5 January 2025

2025-01-05T23:38:41Z

Robert Brockway at 01:23, 26 May 2024

2024-05-26T01:23:39Z

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 The WSWS describes itself as:
 == The 1619 Project ==
@@ Line 13: / Line 17: @@
 WSWS received considerable praise from both liberal historians who contributed to their analysis and conservative commentators for its criticisms. For example, the National Review described it as "one of the few media outlets examining the 1619 Project in critical detail" and extensively cited contributions by historians Gordon S. Wood, who in 2007 was referred to as "the favorite historian of America’s liberal establishment", and James M. McPherson; the research director of the right-wing American Institute for Economic Research told the Dartmouth Review that there was a "strange alliance" between conservative historians and the Trotskyists of WSWS, who he described as "old-school historians" following the data; and Michael Barone in the conservative New York Post gave positive attention to historian Sean Wilentz's criticisms of the project in WSWS.
 https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/05/24/qawh-m24.html

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 2 March 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	The [[World Socialist Web Site]] (WSWS) is the website of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI). It describes itself as an "online newspaper of the international Trotskyist movement".
		+
	The WSWS describes itself as:		The WSWS describes itself as:
		+
		+	== The 1619 Project ==
		+
		+	In 2019, WSWS received considerable attention for its criticisms of the New York Times' The 1619 Project, which aimed to reframe American history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans at the center of the country's national narrative. WSWS described the project as "one component of a deliberate effort to inject racial politics into the heart of the 2020 elections and foment divisions among the working class." According to The Washington Post:
		+
		+	<blockquote>
		+	On Dec. 16 [2020], Wall Street Journal opinion columnist Elliot Kaufman brought into the mainstream criticisms of the 1619 Project from four historians who had been questioning it for months on the World Socialist website, a fringe news publication founded upon the principles of Trotskyism. Some of what those professors wrote had gained momentum in the Twitterverse and sparked discussion about their analysis of the 1619 Project.
		+	</blockquote>
		+
		+	WSWS received considerable praise from both liberal historians who contributed to their analysis and conservative commentators for its criticisms. For example, the National Review described it as "one of the few media outlets examining the 1619 Project in critical detail" and extensively cited contributions by historians Gordon S. Wood, who in 2007 was referred to as "the favorite historian of America’s liberal establishment", and James M. McPherson; the research director of the right-wing American Institute for Economic Research told the Dartmouth Review that there was a "strange alliance" between conservative historians and the Trotskyists of WSWS, who he described as "old-school historians" following the data; and Michael Barone in the conservative New York Post gave positive attention to historian Sean Wilentz's criticisms of the project in WSWS.
		+
		+

	<blockquote>		<blockquote>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 2 March 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	https://archive.is/3ubS8		https://archive.is/3ubS8
		+
		+	https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/11/16/ffel-n16.html
		+
		+	https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/12/10/stoc-d10.html

	== Quotes ==		== Quotes ==

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 Notwithstanding efforts to portray it as “left wing,” the institution of DEI is entirely compatible with capitalism, nationalism, imperialism and every form of reaction. This is perhaps best illustrated by the extent to which the Central Intelligence Agency has embraced these same methods and jargon.
-<ref>https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/04/03/ndhj-a03.html</ref>
+<ref>https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/04/03/ndhj-a03.html</ref><ref>https://archive.is/wip/MBQIn</ref>
 </blockquote>

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 https://archive.is/3ubS8
-== Quiotes ==
+== Quotes ==
 <blockquote>

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 20 January 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:

	https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/05/24/qawh-m24.html		https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/05/24/qawh-m24.html
		+
		+	https://archive.is/3ubS8

	== Quiotes ==		== Quiotes ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 20 January 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/06/14/ihjm-j14.html		https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/06/14/ihjm-j14.html
		+
		+	https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/05/24/qawh-m24.html

	== Quiotes ==		== Quiotes ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 5 January 2025
Line 23:		Line 23:
	{{Draft}}		{{Draft}}
	{{Marxism}}		{{Marxism}}
		+
		+	== References ==

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 https://www.wsws.org/en/topics/socialIssuesCategory/identity-politics
 {{Draft}}
 {{Marxism}}