Reciprocal partner violence - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 02:33, 3 December 2025

2025-12-03T02:33:43Z

Robert Brockway at 02:31, 3 December 2025

2025-12-03T02:31:05Z

Robert Brockway at 18:12, 9 April 2025

2025-04-09T18:12:56Z

Robert Brockway: /* Commentary */

2025-04-09T18:11:38Z

Commentary

Robert Brockway: /* Commentary */

2025-04-09T05:26:49Z

Commentary

Robert Brockway: /* Response from Feminists */

2025-04-09T05:26:31Z

Response from Feminists

Robert Brockway at 05:15, 9 April 2025

2025-04-09T05:15:03Z

Robert Brockway at 05:14, 9 April 2025

2025-04-09T05:14:28Z

Robert Brockway at 12:54, 20 January 2025

2025-01-20T12:54:31Z

Robert Brockway at 12:46, 20 January 2025

2025-01-20T12:46:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 3 December 2025
Line 63:		Line 63:
	== Dunedin Study ==		== Dunedin Study ==

		+	{{Dunedin Study}}
−	The [[Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study]], commonly called the ''Dunedin Study'' is a [[longitudinal study]] being undertaken in Dunedin, New Zealand.
−
−	The Dunedin Study found high rates of reciprocal IPV among study participants. The document “Findings About Partner Violence From the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study” released by the US National Institute of Justice found:
−
−	<blockquote>When the data were analyzed, victimized women were 10 times more likely to be perpetrators than other women and male perpetrators also were 19 times more likely to be victims than other men."<ref>http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/170018.pdf</ref></blockquote>

	== National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health ==		== National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:31, 3 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{RPV}}
−	[[File:GR0ikQOWQAAXg9q.jpeg\|thumb\|Credit: [[TheTinMenBlog]].]]
−
−	[[Reciprocal partner violence]] (RPV), also known as bi-directional partner violence, involves [[intimate partner violence]] (IPV) in which each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and victim of IPV. Research shows a high proportion of IPV is reciprocal. This is not about provocation in the moment. Rather this a long term trend in which each partner initiates IPV against the other, often at different times.
−
−	Key findings in relation to RPV include:<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/</ref>
−
−	* One of the key indicators of whether a woman will be a victim of IPV is whether she is a perpetrator of IPV.
−	* Women tend to be violent more often in a reciprocally violent relationship over one where they are the only violent partner.
−	* Women are more likely to be injured as a result of RPV.
−
−	It follows from the last finding that women could reduce their chances of being a victim of IPV by avoiding being a perpetrator.

	== PASK ==		== PASK ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 9 April 2025
Line 106:		Line 106:
	*[https://www.restorativechange.org.uk/ Restorative Change]		*[https://www.restorativechange.org.uk/ Restorative Change]

		+	{{Featured}}
⚫	== References ==
		+	{{RPV}}

		⚫	== References ==
−	[[Category:Intimate Partner Violence]]
−	[[Category:Featured Articles]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 9 April 2025
Line 93:		Line 93:
	== Commentary ==		== Commentary ==

		+	{{WWUF}}
−	Until recently [[feminist]]s rejected RPV outright. With the wider community now recognising RPV feminists have shifted to attempting to excuse women's violence in relationships but their own research shows that women initiate partner violence. The Australian study [[Women who use force]] lists self-defence, retaliation, anger and stress as common reasons that women are violent in relationships.<ref>https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/women-who-use-force</ref><ref>https://archive.is/Kmrps</ref>
−	<ref>https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-online-hate-for-amber-heard</ref><ref>https://archive.is/4dzfm</ref> The last three are not justifiable reasons to use violence in a relationship. Notably the study uses the word ''force'' rather than ''violence' when describing women's actions.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 == Commentary ==
-Until recently feminists rejected RPV outright.  With the wider community now recognising RPV feminists have shifted to attempting to excuse women's violence in relationships but their own research shows that women initiate partner violence.   The Australian study [[Women who use force]] lists self-defence, retaliation, anger and stress as common reasons that women are violent in relationships.<ref>https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/women-who-use-force</ref><ref>https://archive.is/Kmrps</ref>
+Until recently [[feminist]]s rejected RPV outright.  With the wider community now recognising RPV feminists have shifted to attempting to excuse women's violence in relationships but their own research shows that women initiate partner violence.   The Australian study [[Women who use force]] lists self-defence, retaliation, anger and stress as common reasons that women are violent in relationships.<ref>https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/women-who-use-force</ref><ref>https://archive.is/Kmrps</ref>
 <ref>https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-online-hate-for-amber-heard</ref><ref>https://archive.is/4dzfm</ref> The last three are not justifiable reasons to use violence in a relationship.  Notably the study uses the word ''force'' rather than ''violence' when describing women's actions.

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 Governments, domestic violence organisations and the wider community completely ignore reciprocal IPV. By ignoring the prevalence of reciprocal IPV these groups are preventing effective interventions as they discount the need to intervene with violent women. This will contribute to the continuation of reciprocal IPV and actually make it more likely that the women involved will be injured.  Ignoring women's violence contributes to violence against women.
-== Response from Feminists ==
+== Commentary ==
 Until recently feminists rejected RPV outright.  With the wider community now recognising RPV feminists have shifted to attempting to excuse women's violence in relationships but their own research shows that women initiate partner violence.   The Australian study [[Women who use force]] lists self-defence, retaliation, anger and stress as common reasons that women are violent in relationships.<ref>https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/women-who-use-force</ref><ref>https://archive.is/Kmrps</ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 9 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[File:GR0ikQOWQAAXg9q.jpeg\|thumb\|Credit: [[TheTinMenBlog]]]]	+	[[File:GR0ikQOWQAAXg9q.jpeg\|thumb\|Credit: [[TheTinMenBlog]].]]

	[[Reciprocal partner violence]] (RPV), also known as bi-directional partner violence, involves [[intimate partner violence]] (IPV) in which each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and victim of IPV. Research shows a high proportion of IPV is reciprocal. This is not about provocation in the moment. Rather this a long term trend in which each partner initiates IPV against the other, often at different times.		[[Reciprocal partner violence]] (RPV), also known as bi-directional partner violence, involves [[intimate partner violence]] (IPV) in which each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and victim of IPV. Research shows a high proportion of IPV is reciprocal. This is not about provocation in the moment. Rather this a long term trend in which each partner initiates IPV against the other, often at different times.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * One of the key indicators of whether a woman will be a victim of IPV is whether she is a perpetrator of IPV.
 * Women tend to be violent more often in a reciprocally violent relationship over one where they are the only violent partner.
-* Women are more likely to be injured as a result of RPV
+* Women are more likely to be injured as a result of RPV.
-It follows from the last finding that women could reduce their changes of being a victim of IPV by avoiding being a perpetrator.
+It follows from the last finding that women could reduce their chances of being a victim of IPV by avoiding being a perpetrator.
 == PASK ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[File:GR0ikQOWQAAXg9q.jpeg|thumb|Credit: [[TheTinMenBlog]]]]
-[[Reciprocal partner violence]], also known as bi-directional partner violence, involves [[intimate partner violence]] (IPV) in which each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and victim of IPV. Research shows a high proportion of IPV is reciprocal.
+[[Reciprocal partner violence]] (RPV), also known as bi-directional partner violence, involves [[intimate partner violence]] (IPV) in which each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and victim of IPV. Research shows a high proportion of IPV is reciprocal.  This is not about provocation in the moment.  Rather this a long term trend in which each partner initiates IPV against the other, often at different times.
 == PASK ==

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [[Reciprocal partner violence]], also known as bi-directional partner violence, involves [[intimate partner violence]] (IPV) in which each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and victim of IPV. Research shows a high proportion of IPV is reciprocal.
-One of the key indicators of whether a woman will be a victim of IPV is whether she is a perpetrator of DV/IPV.  "Reciprocity was associated with more frequent violence among women"<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/</ref>.  Women are also more likely to be injured as a result of IPV so it follows one key way that women could avoid being a victim of IPV is to not be a perpetrator.  This is not about provocation in the moment.  Rather this a long term trend in which a man and a woman initiate IPV against each other.
+One of the key indicators of whether a woman will be a victim of IPV is whether she is a perpetrator of DV/IPV.  "Reciprocity was associated with more frequent violence among women".  Women are also more likely to be injured as a result of IPV so it follows one key way that women could avoid being a victim of IPV is to not be a perpetrator.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/</ref>
 == PASK ==