Meta-analysis - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 04:32, 29 January 2025

2025-01-29T04:32:33Z

2025-01-29T04:31:44Z

2025-01-29T04:31:10Z

2024-11-13T10:57:02Z

2024-11-13T10:56:23Z

2024-08-30T15:51:10Z

2024-02-26T01:17:28Z

2024-02-26T01:16:05Z

2024-02-26T01:15:53Z

2024-02-26T01:15:35Z

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Not only can meta-analyses provide an estimate of the unknown effect size, it also has the capacity to contrast results from different studies and identify patterns among study results, sources of disagreement among those results, or other interesting relationships that may come to light with multiple studies.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta-analysis&oldid=1148306249</ref>
-Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]], also known as cohort studies, offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
+In relation to issues such as [[intimate partner violence]], meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]], also known as cohort studies, offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
 [[PASK]] is a meta-analysis.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Not only can meta-analyses provide an estimate of the unknown effect size, it also has the capacity to contrast results from different studies and identify patterns among study results, sources of disagreement among those results, or other interesting relationships that may come to light with multiple studies.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta-analysis&oldid=1148306249</ref>
-Meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and [[longitudinal studies]], also known as cohort studies, offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
+Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]], also known as cohort studies, offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
 [[PASK]] is a meta-analysis.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Not only can meta-analyses provide an estimate of the unknown effect size, it also has the capacity to contrast results from different studies and identify patterns among study results, sources of disagreement among those results, or other interesting relationships that may come to light with multiple studies.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta-analysis&oldid=1148306249</ref>
-Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]], also known as cohort studies, offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
+Meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and [[longitudinal studies]], also known as cohort studies, offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
 [[PASK]] is a meta-analysis.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Not only can meta-analyses provide an estimate of the unknown effect size, it also has the capacity to contrast results from different studies and identify patterns among study results, sources of disagreement among those results, or other interesting relationships that may come to light with multiple studies.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta-analysis&oldid=1148306249</ref>
-Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]] (also known as cohort studies) offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
+Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]], also known as cohort studies, offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
 [[PASK]] is a meta-analysis.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Not only can meta-analyses provide an estimate of the unknown effect size, it also has the capacity to contrast results from different studies and identify patterns among study results, sources of disagreement among those results, or other interesting relationships that may come to light with multiple studies.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta-analysis&oldid=1148306249</ref>
-Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]] offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
+Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]] (also known as cohort studies) offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy in preference to individual studies.
 [[PASK]] is a meta-analysis.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 30 August 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[File:Hierarchy_of_Evidence.png\|thumb\|Meta-analyses offer the most compelling evidence.]]
		+
	A [[meta-analysis]] is a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies. Meta-analyses can be performed when there are multiple scientific studies addressing the same question, with each individual study reporting measurements that are expected to have some degree of error. The aim then is to use approaches from statistics to derive a pooled estimate closest to the unknown common truth based on how this error is perceived. Meta-analytic results are considered the most trustworthy source of evidence by the evidence-based medicine literature.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta-analysis&oldid=1148306249</ref>		A [[meta-analysis]] is a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies. Meta-analyses can be performed when there are multiple scientific studies addressing the same question, with each individual study reporting measurements that are expected to have some degree of error. The aim then is to use approaches from statistics to derive a pooled estimate closest to the unknown common truth based on how this error is perceived. Meta-analytic results are considered the most trustworthy source of evidence by the evidence-based medicine literature.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta-analysis&oldid=1148306249</ref>

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 {{Featured}}
 {{Glossary}}
 {{Wikipedia}}

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Not only can meta-analyses provide an estimate of the unknown effect size, it also has the capacity to contrast results from different studies and identify patterns among study results, sources of disagreement among those results, or other interesting relationships that may come to light with multiple studies.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta-analysis&oldid=1148306249</ref>
 Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]] offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy over individual studies.
 == See Also ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 26 February 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	[[PASK]] is a meta-analysis.		[[PASK]] is a meta-analysis.
		+
		+	Meta-analyses and [[longitudinal studies]] offer the most compelling results and should be cited in advocacy over individual studies.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==