Men are Obsolete (Munk debate) - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 09:51, 16 September 2025

2025-09-16T09:51:33Z

2023-02-01T05:57:45Z

2023-02-01T05:57:11Z

2022-12-01T07:03:09Z

2022-11-30T03:57:03Z

2022-11-30T00:18:04Z

2022-11-30T00:17:30Z

2020-12-11T09:43:45Z

2020-12-11T09:40:33Z

2020-12-11T09:37:21Z

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>
 == See Also ==
@@ Line 17: / Line 20: @@
 *[https://omny.fm/shows/the-munk-debates-podcast/be-it-resolved-men-are-obsolete Audio of the Monk Debate]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]].  Monk debates poll the audience.  If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried.  In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.
-The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>
+The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>
 == See Also ==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]].  Monk debates poll the audience.  If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried.  In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.
-The above Munk debate was followed by an of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>
+The above Munk debate was followed by an article of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>
 == See Also ==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]].  Monk debates poll the audience.  If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried.  In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.
-The above Munk debate was followed by an article in TIME by the same name by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>
+The above Munk debate was followed by an of the same name in [[TIME]] by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>
 == See Also ==

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:57, 30 November 2022
(No difference)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate.  Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.
-The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]].  Monk debates poll the audience.  If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried.  In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmative to keep their female partners happy.
+The ''affirmative'' team was comprised of [[Hanna Rosin]] and [[Maureen Dowd]] with the negative team being comprised of [[Caitlin Moran]] and [[Camille Paglia]].  Monk debates poll the audience.  If more than 50% vote in favour of the motion (for the pro side) then the motion is carried.  In this case, the motion was carried and Monk declared that men are obsolete.<ref>https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century</ref> Some commentators suggested that a number of men in the audience voted affirmatively to keep their female partners happy.
 The above Munk debate was followed by an article in TIME by the same name by Rosin.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/ Men are Obsolete</ref>

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 *[https://munkdebates.com/debates/gender-in-the-21st-century Men are Obsolete at the Monk Debates]
 *[http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/he-who-pays-the-piper-calls-the-tune-or-does-he/ He who pays the piper]
 == References ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 11 December 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	This highly offensive notion was the title and subject of a Munk Debate in ~~2014~~.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>	+	This highly offensive notion was the title and subject of a Munk Debate in 2013.<ref>http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/</ref>

	While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate. Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.		While the question was ''about'' men the organisers saw fit not to include any men in the debate. Apparently they ascribe to the notion that only women are entitled to discuss gender issues.