Kyriarchy - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 10:31, 9 December 2022

2022-12-09T10:31:31Z

Robert Brockway at 04:16, 1 December 2022

2022-12-01T04:16:28Z

Robert Brockway at 15:34, 24 September 2020

2020-09-24T15:34:18Z

Robert Brockway at 03:22, 17 April 2020

2020-04-17T03:22:21Z

Robert Brockway at 01:58, 19 August 2014

2014-08-19T01:58:30Z

Robert Brockway at 13:48, 9 July 2014

2014-07-09T13:48:36Z

Robert Brockway at 13:46, 9 July 2014

2014-07-09T13:46:00Z

Robert Brockway at 13:39, 9 July 2014

2014-07-09T13:39:24Z

Robert Brockway at 13:38, 9 July 2014

2014-07-09T13:38:17Z

Robert Brockway: Created page with "'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of patriarchy originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppres..."

2014-07-09T13:37:27Z

Created page with "'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of patriarchy originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppres..."

New page

'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of [[patriarchy]] originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppression of women by men, as evidenced by this quote.

{{quote
|text = [T]he [[universalist]] kyriocentric rhetoric of Euro-American elite men does not simply reinforce the dominance of the male sex, but it legitimates the imperial "White Father" or, in black idiom, the enslaving "Boss-Man" as the universal subject. By implication, any [[critical theory]] — be it critical race, feminist, liberationist, or Marxist theory — that articulates gender, class, or race difference as a primary and originary difference masks the complex interstructuring of kyriarchal dominations inscribed ''in'' the subject positions of individual wo/men and in the status positions of dominance and subordination ''between'' wo/men. It also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing [[colonialism|colonialist]] conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.
|sign = [[Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza]]
|source = ''Exploring the Intersections of Race, Gender, Status and Ethnicity in Early Christian Studies'', 2009{{r|fiorenza_2009}}
}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:31, 9 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of [[patriarchy]] originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppression of women by men, as evidenced by this quote.		'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of [[patriarchy]] originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppression of women by men, as evidenced by this quote.

		+	<blockquote>
−	The Universalist kyriocentric rhetoric of Euro-American elite men does not simply reinforce the dominance of the male sex, but it legitimates the imperial "White
		+	The Universalist kyriocentric rhetoric of Euro-American elite men does not simply reinforce the dominance of the male sex, but it legitimates the imperial "White Father" or, in black idiom, the enslaving "Boss-Man" as the universal subject. By implication, any critical theory — be it critical race, feminist, liberationist, or Marxist theory — that articulates gender, class, or race difference as a primary and originary difference masks the complex interstructuring of kyriarchal dominations inscribed ''in'' the subject positions of individual wo/men and in the status positions of dominance and subordination ''between'' wo/men. It also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing colonialist conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.
−	Father" or, in black idiom, the enslaving "Boss-Man" as the universal subject. By implication, any critical theory — be it critical race, feminist,
		+	</blockquote>
−	liberationist, or Marxist theory — that articulates gender, class, or race difference as a primary and originary difference masks the complex interstructuring of
−	kyriarchal dominations inscribed ''in'' the subject positions of individual wo/men and in the status positions of dominance and subordination ''between'' wo/men. It
−	also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing
−	colonialist conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.

	In moving from patriarchy to kyirarchy feminists themselves are showing that patriarchy was a flawed and overly simplistic idea.		In moving from patriarchy to kyirarchy feminists themselves are showing that patriarchy was a flawed and overly simplistic idea.

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 * [[Critical theory]]
-[[Category:Featured Articles]]
+[[Category: Featured Articles]]
-[[Category:Feminism]]
+[[Category: Feminism]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 24 September 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:

	* [[Patriarchy]]		* [[Patriarchy]]
		+	* [[Critical theory]]

	[[Category:Featured Articles]]		[[Category:Featured Articles]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 17 April 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:

	* [[Patriarchy]]		* [[Patriarchy]]
		+
		+	[[Category:Featured Articles]]
		+	[[Category:Feminism]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 19 August 2014
Line 8:		Line 8:
	colonialist conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.		colonialist conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.

		+	In moving from patriarchy to kyirarchy feminists themselves are showing that patriarchy was a flawed and overly simplistic idea.
⚫	Like the feminist notion of ~~patriarchy~~, kyriarchy is unfalsifiable.
		+
		⚫	Like the feminist notion of [[The Patriarchy]], kyriarchy is unfalsifiable.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 9 July 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Like the feminist notion of patriarchy, kyriarchy is unfalsifiable.		Like the feminist notion of patriarchy, kyriarchy is unfalsifiable.
		+
		+	== See Also ==
		+
		+	* [[Patriarchy]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 9 July 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing		also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing
	colonialist conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.		colonialist conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.
		+
		+	Like the feminist notion of patriarchy, kyriarchy is unfalsifiable.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 9 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of [[patriarchy]] originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppression of women by men, as evidenced by this quote.		'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of [[patriarchy]] originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppression of women by men, as evidenced by this quote.

		+	The Universalist kyriocentric rhetoric of Euro-American elite men does not simply reinforce the dominance of the male sex, but it legitimates the imperial "White
−	The Universalist kyriocentric rhetoric of Euro-American elite men does not simply reinforce the dominance of the male sex, but it legitimates the imperial "White Father" or, in black idiom, the enslaving "Boss-Man" as the universal subject. By implication, any [[critical theory]] — be it critical race, feminist, liberationist, or Marxist theory — that articulates gender, class, or race difference as a primary and originary difference masks the complex interstructuring of kyriarchal dominations inscribed ''in'' the subject positions of individual wo/men and in the status positions of dominance and subordination ''between'' wo/men. It also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing [[colonialism\|colonialist]] conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.
		+	Father" or, in black idiom, the enslaving "Boss-Man" as the universal subject. By implication, any critical theory — be it critical race, feminist,
		+	liberationist, or Marxist theory — that articulates gender, class, or race difference as a primary and originary difference masks the complex interstructuring of
		+	kyriarchal dominations inscribed ''in'' the subject positions of individual wo/men and in the status positions of dominance and subordination ''between'' wo/men. It
		+	also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing
		+	colonialist conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 9 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of [[patriarchy]] originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppression of women by men, as evidenced by this quote.		'''Kyriarchy''' is an extension of the feminist notions of [[patriarchy]] originally proposed by Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza in 1992. Kyriarchy still focusses on the oppression of women by men, as evidenced by this quote.

		⚫	The Universalist kyriocentric rhetoric of Euro-American elite men does not simply reinforce the dominance of the male sex, but it legitimates the imperial "White Father" or, in black idiom, the enslaving "Boss-Man" as the universal subject. By implication, any [[critical theory]] — be it critical race, feminist, liberationist, or Marxist theory — that articulates gender, class, or race difference as a primary and originary difference masks the complex interstructuring of kyriarchal dominations inscribed ''in'' the subject positions of individual wo/men and in the status positions of dominance and subordination ''between'' wo/men. It also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing [[colonialism\|colonialist]] conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.
−	{{quote
⚫	~~\|text~~ ~~= [T]he [[universalist]]~~ kyriocentric rhetoric of Euro-American elite men does not simply reinforce the dominance of the male sex, but it legitimates the imperial "White Father" or, in black idiom, the enslaving "Boss-Man" as the universal subject. By implication, any [[critical theory]] — be it critical race, feminist, liberationist, or Marxist theory — that articulates gender, class, or race difference as a primary and originary difference masks the complex interstructuring of kyriarchal dominations inscribed ''in'' the subject positions of individual wo/men and in the status positions of dominance and subordination ''between'' wo/men. It also masks the participation of white elite wo/men, or better "ladies," and of Christian religion in kyriarchal oppression, insofar as both have served as civilizing [[colonialism\|colonialist]] conduits of kyriarchal knowledges, values, and culture.
−	\|sign = [[Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza]]
−	\|source = ''Exploring the Intersections of Race, Gender, Status and Ethnicity in Early Christian Studies'', 2009{{r\|fiorenza_2009}}
−	}}