Intimate partner violence - Revision history

Robert Brockway: /* Same Sex */

2025-05-11T08:40:13Z

Same Sex

Robert Brockway: /* External Links */

2024-04-25T01:33:14Z

External Links

Robert Brockway at 14:57, 10 February 2024

2024-02-10T14:57:33Z

Robert Brockway at 14:51, 10 February 2024

2024-02-10T14:51:05Z

Robert Brockway at 14:50, 10 February 2024

2024-02-10T14:50:20Z

Robert Brockway at 14:50, 10 February 2024

2024-02-10T14:50:00Z

Robert Brockway at 14:49, 10 February 2024

2024-02-10T14:49:31Z

Robert Brockway at 14:47, 10 February 2024

2024-02-10T14:47:49Z

Robert Brockway at 03:14, 20 January 2024

2024-01-20T03:14:00Z

Robert Brockway at 09:32, 30 June 2023

2023-06-30T09:32:16Z

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 == Same Sex ==
-Male-Male couples experience lower rates of IPV than male-female couples.  Female-female couples experience higher rates of IPV than male-female couples.<ref>https://time.com/2921491/home-solo-women-violence/</ref><ref>https://archive.is/GmBka</ref>
+Male-Male couples experience lower rates of IPV than male-female couples.  Female-female couples experience higher rates of IPV than male-female couples.<ref>https://time.com/2921491/home-solo-women-violence/</ref><ref>https://archive.is/GmBka</ref><ref>https://dcvlp.org/domestic-violence-peaks-more-than-ever-for-the-lgbtqia-community/</ref><ref>https://archive.is/e59Tu</ref>
 == See Also ==

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15248380231165690
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15248380231162972
 == Quote ==

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 == Same Sex ==
-Male-Male couples experience lower rates of IPV than male-female couples.  Female-female couples experience higher rates of IPV than male-female couples.<ref>https://time.com/2921491/home-solo-women-violence/</ref>
+Male-Male couples experience lower rates of IPV than male-female couples.  Female-female couples experience higher rates of IPV than male-female couples.<ref>https://time.com/2921491/home-solo-women-violence/</ref><ref>https://archive.is/GmBka</ref>
 == See Also ==

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 But I thought there was no excuse for DV/IPV?
-{{Featured}}
+{{Draft}}
 {{IPV}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 10 February 2024
Line 62:		Line 62:
	But I thought there was no excuse for DV/IPV?		But I thought there was no excuse for DV/IPV?

		+	{{Featured}}
⚫	== References ==
		+	{{IPV}}

		⚫	== References ==
−	[[Category:Draft Articles]]
−	[[Category:Intimate Partner Violence]]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 One of the most significant indicators that a woman will be a victim of IPV is that she is a perpetrator of IPV.
-This leads to the inescapable conclusion that any intervention strategy that ignores reciprocal IPV[1] fails women as well as men. This being *all* mainstream (feminist inspired) intervention strategies
+This leads to the inescapable conclusion that any intervention strategy that ignores reciprocal IPV fails women as well as men. This being *all* mainstream (feminist inspired) intervention strategies
 FBI data from the mid-1970s to mid-1980s found that for every 100 husbands who killed their wives in the United States, about 75 women killed their husbands.<ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01102.x</ref>

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[Intimate partner violence]] (IPV) is violence between people that are in an intimate relationship.  This is distinct from [[domestic violence]] (DV) which can include violence between any two people that live together or are related.  Along with DV the definition of IPV has steadily broadened since the 1960s.  Whereas IPV was originally seen as physical violence it now encompasses many behaviours including, most recently in many countries, [[coercive control]].
 More than half of all IPV is reciprocal, meaning that each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and a victim of IPV.  This is called reciprocal IPV or [[reciprocal partner violence]].  The [[Partner Abuse State of Knowledge]] (PASK) Project, the largest meta-analysis of DV/IPV research ever undertaken, found that in large population samples 57.9% of all IPV is reciprocal.<ref>http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org</ref>
@@ Line 11: / Line 13: @@
 Women are more likely to have serious injuries as a result of IPV but some recent research suggests that men are more likely to be injured overall.
-About half of all IPV is reciprocal with both partners perpetrators and victims. Of non-reciprocal IPV women are perpetrators in about 70% of cases.
+About half of all IPV is reciprocal with both partners perpetrators and victims. Of non-reciprocal IPV women are perpetrators in about 70% of cases. Injury rates are higher in reciprocal IPV and the difference is greater for women than men.
 One of the most significant indicators that a woman will be a victim of IPV is that she is a perpetrator of IPV.
-This leads to the inescapable conclusion that any intervention strategy that ignores reciprocal IPV[1] fails women as well as men.
+This leads to the inescapable conclusion that any intervention strategy that ignores reciprocal IPV[1] fails women as well as men. This being *all* mainstream (feminist inspired) intervention strategies
 FBI data from the mid-1970s to mid-1980s found that for every 100 husbands who killed their wives in the United States, about 75 women killed their husbands.<ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01102.x</ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 10 February 2024
Line 24:		Line 24:

	<blockquote>Throughout the fifteen-year period of this study, women were over 40 percent of the offenders in lethal domestic assaults. Both victims and offenders in these intimate partner incidents were disproportionately Black. When comparing the sex ratios of killing by racial/ethnic subgroups, Black women were equally (or more) likely than Black men to be the perpetrators of intimate domestic homicide. Among non-Hispanic Whites (including Asians, others), there were 63 female intimate partner homicide offenders for every 100 male offenders. Within the small number of cases involving Hispanic couples, women were much more likely to be the aggressors in intimate partner homicide in the latter time period of this investigation. For both Blacks and Whites women were more likely to be the perpetrators in non-marital dyads.<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J076v41n04_04</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>Throughout the fifteen-year period of this study, women were over 40 percent of the offenders in lethal domestic assaults. Both victims and offenders in these intimate partner incidents were disproportionately Black. When comparing the sex ratios of killing by racial/ethnic subgroups, Black women were equally (or more) likely than Black men to be the perpetrators of intimate domestic homicide. Among non-Hispanic Whites (including Asians, others), there were 63 female intimate partner homicide offenders for every 100 male offenders. Within the small number of cases involving Hispanic couples, women were much more likely to be the aggressors in intimate partner homicide in the latter time period of this investigation. For both Blacks and Whites women were more likely to be the perpetrators in non-marital dyads.<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J076v41n04_04</ref></blockquote>
		+
		+	== Same Sex ==
		+
		+	Male-Male couples experience lower rates of IPV than male-female couples. Female-female couples experience higher rates of IPV than male-female couples.<ref>https://time.com/2921491/home-solo-women-violence/</ref>

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[File:Fz24XRGaUAECc7-.jpeg|thumb|Graphic showing a break-down of IPV.]]
-[[Intimate partner violence]] (IPV) is violence between people that are in an intimate relationship.  This is distinct from [[domestic violence]] (DV) which can include violence between any two people that live together or are related.  Along with DV the definition of IPV has steadily broadened since the 1960s.  Whereas IPV was originally seen as physical violence it not encompasses many behaviours including, most recently in many countries, [[coercive control]].
+[[Intimate partner violence]] (IPV) is violence between people that are in an intimate relationship.  This is distinct from [[domestic violence]] (DV) which can include violence between any two people that live together or are related.  Along with DV the definition of IPV has steadily broadened since the 1960s.  Whereas IPV was originally seen as physical violence it now encompasses many behaviours including, most recently in many countries, [[coercive control]].
 More than half of all IPV is reciprocal, meaning that each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and a victim of IPV.  This is called reciprocal IPV or [[reciprocal partner violence]].  The [[Partner Abuse State of Knowledge]] (PASK) Project, the largest meta-analysis of DV/IPV research ever undertaken, found that in large population samples 57.9% of all IPV is reciprocal.<ref>http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org</ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 30 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[File:Fz24XRGaUAECc7-.jpeg\|thumb\|Graphic showing a break-down of IPV.]]
		+
	[[Intimate partner violence]] (IPV) is violence between people that are in an intimate relationship. This is distinct from [[domestic violence]] (DV) which can include violence between any two people that live together or are related. Along with DV the definition of IPV has steadily broadened since the 1960s. Whereas IPV was originally seen as physical violence it not encompasses many behaviours including, most recently in many countries, [[coercive control]].		[[Intimate partner violence]] (IPV) is violence between people that are in an intimate relationship. This is distinct from [[domestic violence]] (DV) which can include violence between any two people that live together or are related. Along with DV the definition of IPV has steadily broadened since the 1960s. Whereas IPV was originally seen as physical violence it not encompasses many behaviours including, most recently in many countries, [[coercive control]].