In-group bias - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 13:28, 27 March 2023

2023-03-27T13:28:48Z

Robert Brockway at 13:28, 27 March 2023

2023-03-27T13:28:31Z

Robert Brockway at 21:59, 27 November 2022

2022-11-27T21:59:06Z

Robert Brockway at 03:50, 16 October 2022

2022-10-16T03:50:46Z

Robert Brockway at 03:50, 16 October 2022

2022-10-16T03:50:04Z

Robert Brockway at 03:49, 16 October 2022

2022-10-16T03:49:29Z

Robert Brockway at 03:43, 16 October 2022

2022-10-16T03:43:17Z

Robert Brockway: Removed redirect to Women are wonderful

2022-10-16T03:41:43Z

Removed redirect to Women are wonderful

Robert Brockway: Redirected page to Women are wonderful

2020-06-09T01:46:17Z

Redirected page to Women are wonderful

Robert Brockway at 01:42, 9 June 2020

2020-06-09T01:42:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 27 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[In-group]] bias refers to a group's members preferring each other over those outside of the group. Research clearly show that women have a strong [[in-group bias]].	+	[[In-group bias]] refers to a group's members preferring each other over those outside of the group. Research clearly show that women have a strong [[in-group bias]].

	Rudman & Goodwin (2004) conducted research on gender bias that measured gender preferences without directly asking the participants.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/</ref> Subjects at Purdue and Rutgers participated in computerized tasks that measured automatic attitudes based on how quickly a person categorizes pleasant and unpleasant attributes with each gender. Such a task was done to discover whether people associate pleasant words (good, happy, and sunshine) with women, and unpleasant words (bad, trouble, and pain) with men. This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men.<ref>https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140718210210/http://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref>		Rudman & Goodwin (2004) conducted research on gender bias that measured gender preferences without directly asking the participants.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/</ref> Subjects at Purdue and Rutgers participated in computerized tasks that measured automatic attitudes based on how quickly a person categorizes pleasant and unpleasant attributes with each gender. Such a task was done to discover whether people associate pleasant words (good, happy, and sunshine) with women, and unpleasant words (bad, trouble, and pain) with men. This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men.<ref>https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140718210210/http://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 27 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[In-group]] bias refers to a group's members preferring each other over those outside of the group. Research clearly show that women have a strong [[in-group bias]].
−	In general humans views women more favourably than men.

	Rudman & Goodwin (2004) conducted research on gender bias that measured gender preferences without directly asking the participants.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/</ref> Subjects at Purdue and Rutgers participated in computerized tasks that measured automatic attitudes based on how quickly a person categorizes pleasant and unpleasant attributes with each gender. Such a task was done to discover whether people associate pleasant words (good, happy, and sunshine) with women, and unpleasant words (bad, trouble, and pain) with men. This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men.<ref>https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140718210210/http://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref>		Rudman & Goodwin (2004) conducted research on gender bias that measured gender preferences without directly asking the participants.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/</ref> Subjects at Purdue and Rutgers participated in computerized tasks that measured automatic attitudes based on how quickly a person categorizes pleasant and unpleasant attributes with each gender. Such a task was done to discover whether people associate pleasant words (good, happy, and sunshine) with women, and unpleasant words (bad, trouble, and pain) with men. This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men.<ref>https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140718210210/http://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 In general humans views women more favourably than men.
@@ Line 9: / Line 7: @@
 *[[Gender bias]]
 *[[Women are wonderful]]
 == References ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 16 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{wikipedia}}
		+
	In general humans views women more favourably than men.		In general humans views women more favourably than men.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 16 October 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:

	[[Category: Featured Articles]]		[[Category: Featured Articles]]
		+	[[Category: Glossary]]
		+	[[Category: Gynocentrism]]
		+	[[Category: Wikipedia]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 16 October 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:

	== References ==		== References ==
		+
		+	[[Category: Featured Articles]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Rudman & Goodwin (2004) conducted research on gender bias that measured gender preferences without directly asking the participants.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/</ref> Subjects at Purdue and Rutgers participated in computerized tasks that measured automatic attitudes based on how quickly a person categorizes pleasant and unpleasant attributes with each gender. Such a task was done to discover whether people associate pleasant words (good, happy, and sunshine) with women, and unpleasant words (bad, trouble, and pain) with men. This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men.<ref>https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140718210210/http://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref>
@@ Line 6: / Line 5: @@
 == See Also ==
 *[[Women are wonderful]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:41, 16 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+
⚫	~~#REDIRECT~~ [[~~women~~ are wonderful]]
		+
		+
		+	Rudman & Goodwin (2004) conducted research on gender bias that measured gender preferences without directly asking the participants.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/</ref> Subjects at Purdue and Rutgers participated in computerized tasks that measured automatic attitudes based on how quickly a person categorizes pleasant and unpleasant attributes with each gender. Such a task was done to discover whether people associate pleasant words (good, happy, and sunshine) with women, and unpleasant words (bad, trouble, and pain) with men. This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men.<ref>https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140718210210/http://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref>
		+
		+	== See Also ==
		+
		⚫	*[[Women are wonderful]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 9 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
		⚫	#REDIRECT [[women are wonderful]]
−	Rudman & Goodwin (2004) conducted research on gender bias that measured gender preferences without directly asking the participants. Subjects at Purdue and Rutgers participated in computerized tasks that measured automatic attitudes based on how quickly a person categorizes pleasant and unpleasant attributes with each gender. Such a task was done to discover whether people associate pleasant words (good, happy, and sunshine) with women, and unpleasant words (bad, trouble, and pain) with<ref>https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140718210210/http://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf</ref>
−
−	This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men and only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem, revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic preference for their own gender.
−
−	== See Also ==
−
−	*[[Gynocentrism]]
⚫	*[[~~Women~~ are wonderful]]
−
−	== References ==
−
−	[[Category:Featured Articles]]
−	[[Category:Glossary]]
−	[[Category:Wikipedia]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:42, 9 June 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:

	This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men and only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem, revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic preference for their own gender.		This research found that while both women and men have more favourable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger than those of men and only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem, revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic preference for their own gender.
		+
		+	== See Also ==
		+
		+	*[[Gynocentrism]]
		+	*[[Women are wonderful]]

	== References ==		== References ==