Anita Sarkeesian–and Wikipedia–busted again
Despite amazingly disingenuous claims to the contrary, Wikipedia remains intractably corrupted–this time in defense of con artist Anita Sarkeesian.
Despite amazingly disingenuous claims to the contrary, Wikipedia remains intractably corrupted–this time in defense of con artist Anita Sarkeesian.
Surprise, surprise, everyone. Anita Sarkeesian is being terrorized on Twitter
Ben Kuchera, writing at Polygon, wants us to know that violence against women in video games is not acceptable. And that women are, apparently, just dogs to be kicked in most video games. Or something like that. Mateusz Wacek looks at his logic and finds it wanting.
Anita Sarkeesian once again makes a public demonstration of her character and values, or rather her lack of both. This time an artist has taken her story online about Anita’s illegal use of her content to make money. Same feminist, different day.
There has been a great deal of debunking of this particular feminist of late. None of it compares to this terminal fisking.
It looks like it is a weekend of Anita Sarkeesian at A Voice for Men. Don’t everybody jump for joy at once. We only have so much exuberance to use at a time. Our friend Phil in Utah isn’t exactly dancing either, but he still has the energy to point out a couple of things about Sarkeesian that she would not allow you to say if she had a choice.
Anita Sarkeesian, after months of evading donors, has finally come out with the start of her promised video series on gaming tropes. And woven into her work is a somewhat unexpected message. She is actually complaining about damseling. We have to wonder how she complains about something so crucial to her own cause.
Anita Sarkeesian continues her professional victimhood, profiting massively from her massive deceit of earlier this year.
Andrew DiKaiomata shows us many of the similarities between feminism and traditional conservatism.
Catreece Macleod, as a writer, considers The Bechdel Test, and why the exercise is currently pointless, and what it would take to really make it relevant.